XTOUR.HTM

Tourism and its Impacts on the Environment

by Stephanie A. Thullen

June 28th, 1996


     RESEARCH PAPER NUMBER:   X8
     RESEARCH PAPER MNEMONIC: XTOUR
     RESEARCH PAPER NAME:     Tourism and Trade

     DRAFT AUTHOR:            Stephanie Thullen


  

I. ABSTRACT

Tourism and the environment have a very complex and interdependent relationship. Tourism is one of the largest industries in today's world economy and is a great source of foreign exchange for many developing countries, whose major assets are their natural resources. At the same time, it is the environmental quality of a place that will determine the success of the tourism industry, since it is the principal attraction. There have been disagreements on whether tourism in beneficial or harmful to the environment, and this paper lays out the arguments for both sides, as well as analyzing the issue with several case studies. This analysis will illustrate that tourism, if unplanned and unregulated, can be extremely harmful to the environment, and therefore needs a better, more sustainable alternative that involves the local population in the planning and management of tourism.

II. ISSUE BACKGROUND

Many scholars believe that tourism can be actually beneficial to the environment. Comparing it to other industries, tourism does seem to be much less harmful than other industries, such as manufacturing. It can be argued that since climate, vegetation, wildlife and geology play a large role in attracting tourism, the industry has a stake in the preservation of the environment on which it is based. At the same time, tourism provides the economic means with which to do it. (1) There is evidence from the United States and Europe that tourism has promoted restoration and preservation of historic sites. (2) Tourism has also encouraged conservation of natural resources in places like Africa by establishing national parks and reserves. In the case of these poorer countries, tourism brings in much needed foreign exchange, as well as employment opportunities, demand for local products and improvement in the local infrastructure (3). It is clear from these arguments how tourism and the environment benefit and depend on each other. However, this does not take into account the carrying capacity of these tourist areas. The notion of carrying capacity means that there are limits to the use of natural resources. The environment will probably be damaged if overused, and if the limits of its carrying capacity are surpassed, the ecosystem will loose its sustainability and "be damaged or destroyed for a long time, if not forever." (4) Since most countries at their first stages of tourism development had no control or proper planning for tourism, the carrying capacities of their environment were not taken into account and thereby abused. This is the case for most developing countries in the present time, and therefore, most scholars argue that, there is most likely a conflicting rather that a symbiotic relationship between tourism and the environment. The negative impacts of tourism on the environment can be analyzed in different ways. One of them looks at the specific elements of the ecosystem of the tourist locale. For instance, tourism can a have detrimental effect on vegetation. The collection of plants or careless use of fire can destroy plantlife; littering causes changes in soil nutrients; human and vehicular traffic affects both the soil and the vulnerability of plants. The activities can cause changes in the "percentage cover, species diversity, growth rates and age structures, and habitat diversity." (5) Tourism can also have an effect on air and water quality. Air pollution can be attributed to the congestion of tourist vehicles in resort areas. (6) There can also be pollution of lakes, rivers and oceans caused by large quantities of waste material and inadequately treated sewage from tourist facilities and from oil spills from recreational vehicles. (7) This pollution can transmit diseases such as typhoid, cholera and hepatitis through seafood and can also cause eutrophication by increasing the nutrients in the water. Eutrophication causes fluctuations in the oxygen supply and distribution, which affects all aquatic life. (8) Wildlife can also be adversely affected by tourism. Much of the industry itself is geared towards animal watching or photography, as it is evident from the increase in popularity of safaris in African national parks and the increasing number of tourists traveling to Antarctica. By intruding on the animals' natural lives, tourism can disrupt feeding and breeding patterns, and sometimes can even force the relocation of wildlife. (9) Littering by tourists attracts animals to tourist areas in the parks and alters the animals' natural habitats. (10) The creation of reserves and national parks may also bring about overpopulation of some species. (11) The increasing demand of wildlife souvenirs induces a parallel increase in poaching, since the monetary rewards become greatly attractive to the local population. (12) Resort development can cause harm to the environment on which it is located as well. First of all, it may cause architectural pollution, a condition where resort facilities clash with the native surroundings and architecture. Additionally, coastal resort developments are often unplanned and unregulated causing sprawls along the coastline. A similar situation occurs in mountain areas, where tourism development evolves into "ribbon" development. (13) The infrastructures themselves are unable to handle the numbers and intensity of tourism, which causes "supply failures, pollution and health hazards." (14) Resort development causes segregation of local residents from the resort area, as well, and brings about probably the most serious consequence of resort development, which is traffic congestion. (15) Another way, and probably the better way, to analyze the impacts of tourism on the environment is to look at how tourism affects certain ecosystems. Impacts on each of the previous components affects the entire system. For instance, clearing plantlife for the sake of tourism "disturbs" wildlife and reduces habitats. Without the protection of the entire ecosystem, the survival of an individual species cannot take place. (16) And since these components and ecosystems are interconnected not just locally, but globally, affecting one of these may disrupt another in a different part of the region or even the world. (17) For this paper I will focus on coastal-marine ecosystems since they are the most popular environments for tourism. (17) To allow for better analysis, these will be broken down into marine ecosystems, beaches, and small island ecosystems. Marine ecosystems suffer from the waste disposal by hotels, littering by tourists, fuel seepage from ships and other boat traffic. (18) The European marine ecosystem has probably been the worst affected because it is an inland sea, thus it has a longer self-cleaning process due to the limited tide. (19) (See Mediterranean case). Out of all the components affected in this ecosystem, coral reefs are the most vulnerable. Reefs can be harmed by trampling from scuba divers and snorkelers, untreated sewage dumped from hotels or the resort cities themselves, and many developing countries use coral for construction of hotels and roads. (20) Although stronger than most coastal ecosystems, beaches suffer from tourism development as well. The construction of hotels and roads destroys dunes and beaches, causing severe environmental consequences, such as erosion, which in turn induces more environmental problems (see Bali and Jamaica cases). Beaches also suffer through their displacement in order to build marinas, piers and docks. (21) People themselves can cause damage by littering and scaring away birds. (22) Small island ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to tourism development because of their fragility and shortage of space and freshwater. Space scarcity results from the construction of tourism in the coastal areas, which competes with local residents' needs, like agriculture. There is also competition for water between the "local communal and agricultural sector and the rapidly expanding tourism sector." (23) With small islands, wildlife and plants suffer more as well because of the islands' small area and isolation, thus there is a higher rate of extinction of island species. (24) To better illustrate the issue of tourism and its impact on the environment, the remainder of this paper will analyze case studies dealing with tourism in coastal and marine environments, in particular, small island ecosystems, and will provide as well a policy analysis of these issues. The cases will analyze tourism in the Mediterranean Sea; Bali, Indonesia; Cancun, Mexico; Jamaica; and the island of Tobago.

III. CASE STUDIES

Mediterranean Pollution and Tourism

Tourism is one of the principal contributors of pollution in the Mediterranean Sea and as the numbers of tourists increase, the problems worsen since not only does the ecosystem have to support more and more people, but the resort areas aggravate the problem by overbuilding in order to support and attract even more tourists. This increases the excess garbage and sewage that is dumped directly into the sea and nearby rivers, due to the lack of a regulatory system. Several laws and initiatives have implemented in order to protect the Mediterranean Sea from further degradation, including the Blue Plan, which calls for new development models based on regional cooperation, more attention paid to the effects of development on the environment, and better understanding on environment and development issues in the Mediterranean Region.

Tourism in Bali

Images of rice paddies, beautiful beaches and temples, and a fascinating culture draw tourists from all around the world to the enchanting island of Bali, Indonesia. The tourism plan for Bali intended to cater to upper-class tourists by catering them with luxury resorts, and to protect the island's culture by building these resorts in the southern peninsula of the island away from the local population. However, the development of tourism was not very well regulated and never took into consideration the impact to the environment, and it got an unexpected amount of young budget travelers, which caused the boom of locally owned tourist facilities all over the island. The rapid tourism development of Bali has had a great effect on its natural environment, affecting water resources, increasing pollution and localized flooding, as well as putting pressure on the island's infrastructure.

Cancun Tourism

In Cancun, Mexico, one of the most popular tourist destinations in Mexico, there is a beautiful turquoise lagoon, filled with various indigenous species, and surrounded by white sandy beaches and an ocean filled with coral. Unfortunately, tourism has "extensively damaged the lagoon, obliterated sand dunes, led to the extinction of varying species of animals and fish, and destroyed the rainforest which surrounds" the island. It was only twenty years after it was developed, that the government of Mexico decided to limit projects along the coast to prevent further damage to the island's environment.

Jamaica's Tourism Trade

Tourism is the Jamaica's largest foreign exchange earner and fastest growing industry, and its natural resources, such as its beaches, clear water and vegetation, are the primary selling points for tourists. But the increasing pressures of tourism on the island have caused severe environmental problems: inadequate sewage systems has caused the deterioration of water quality and damage to the coral reefs; construction of the shoreline has caused severe beach erosion due to the obliteration of sand dunes and has caused wetland destruction. Even the crafts industry has contributed to the environmental degradation of Jamaica by causing the reduction of black coral formations and encouraging the theft of coral reefs for souvenir production. As a response, the Jamaican government created the National Resources Conservation Authority to manage the physical environment, require environmental impact assessments for any type of development, and to promote environmental education.

Tobago Oil and Tourism

After the decline of oil revenues in the 1980's, Trinidad and Tobago turned to tourism in order to resolve its serious economic problems. Tourism was seen as a labor intensive activity that would raise employment numbers and generate more revenue for the country. However, the country proceeded without any assessment on the environmental impacts of tourism for their islands. As a result, several environmental problems have arisen in Trinidad and Tobago. There are shortages of water due to the overpopulation of tourists on the island; sand has been depleted for construction, which has damaged beaches and destroyed the habitat of turtles, where they come and lay their eggs. The most damaging effect of tourism has been the destruction of coral reefs, as they are harvested for sale to tourists and destroyed by tourists stepping on them as they enter the water.

IV. CASE ANALYSIS

By looking at the frequency counts of several categories in the Trade and Environment Database of these five cases, one can better compare the different situations occurring in each of these areas. In this paper, three specific categories will be compared: Major Environmental Problem, Impact and Effect, and Type of Measure.


Category Comparison
Category Mediterranean Bali Cancun Jamaica Tobago
Environmental Problem Sea Pollution Habitat Loss Deforestation Land Pollution Habitat Loss
Impact and Effect Medium and Structure Medium and Scale Medium and Regulatory High and Scale Medium and Structure
Type of Measure Regulatory Standard Regulatory Standard Regulatory Standard Regulatory Standard Regulatory Standard




Looking at the differences in the major environmental problem for each case, it is evident how many different problems tourism can cause to the environment. Two of the cases, report pollution as their major problem, which was caused by the increasing amounts of people that have to be accommodated in an area that was not previously prepared to do so. This is primarily due to inadequate infrastructures that cannot properly dispose of the excessive amounts of waste. In Jamaica, the sewage disposal system is not very effective. Many hotels have treatment plants, but they usually cannot effectively handle the large volumes of waste that need to be treated. The case study cites that the average tourist visiting Jamaica consumes "ten times as much water and produces three times as much solid waste" as a local citizen. (25) In the Mediterranean, many of the coastal areas have been overbuilt and overrun by tourists. There are few and not very effective sewage treatment plants in the area, and thus, much of the urban waste is dumped into the sea. And it is not only these two cases that have this problem. In fact, all of the cases report that none of these tourist areas had an adequate infrastructure to handle the ever-increasing amounts of tourists arriving every year. The Cancun case reported deforestation as its major environmental problem, which may indicate its proximity or location within a tropical forest. This deforestation was caused essentially by the overconstruction of hotels and other facilities catering to tourism. Deforestation leads to wildlife destruction and further environmental damages, since forests are so important for the maintenance of the entire habitat. The cases on Bali and Tobago reported habitat loss as their major environmental problem, perhaps because, being small islands, their ecosystems are much more fragile and interdependent. Damage to a certain part of the ecosystem can have serious effects on its other components, especially in such an isolated and delicate environment. Both of these cases have reported beach erosion and other types of land degradation, pollution, inadequate waste-disposal infrastructure, and water shortages, which cause competition between the tourist industry and the local population. The impacts of tourism on environmental problems do not seem to differ so much across cases. All of the cases reported that tourism had a medium impact on the environment, except for Jamaica, which reported a high impact. This trend might indicate that tourism is not as harmful to the environment as other industries could be, but that it still has a significant impact. The Jamaica case illustrates what can happen where there can be an extremely uncontrolled development of tourism, which can completely overwhelm the site's carrying capacity. The environmental degradation reported in Jamaica includes pollution of land and coastal waters, reef damage and severe beach erosion, deforestation, and destruction of wetlands. (26) The other cases, however, do indicate that if uncontrolled and unplanned tourism development continues, their problems may escalate to the level of Jamaica's. For the last category of comparison, Type of Measure, all cases adopted the same: a regulatory standard. In all these cases, there seems to have been no regulatory body or law for controlling tourism developments, a fact which was most surprising for the Mediterranean case, since the region is part of the developed world. Tourism seems to have developed on its own, in each of these cases, without any proper planning or control, and especially without regard to any environmental impact assessment. The lack of regulations allowed for rapid increases in tourist numbers in short periods of time and overconstruction of hotels in shore areas and beaches, all of which has overwhelmed the environmental carrying capacity and infrastructure of these areas. As a result of the environmental degradation caused by tourism, all of these tourist areas adopted different regulatory standards. Several laws were passed in the Mediterranean area, including a directive passed by the EU, where Mediterranean countries were to measure pollution levels in the water. There was also the Mediterranean Action Plan, and the Environmental Program for the Mediterranean, and the Blue Plan. In Bali, the land-use stature is being revised, which will set new parameters for tourism. Meanwhile, the government of Indonesia was forced to freeze hotel construction and to diversify Bali's economy. In the case of Cancun, the government of Mexico established local and regional zoning laws that restrict development and bans development in conservation zones of the Cancun-Tulum corridor, locate in the states of Yucatan and Quintana Roo. In Trinidad and Tobago, a master tourism plan was developed, based on a loan by the Interamerican Development Bank. In Jamaica, the government resorted to establishing the National Resources Conservation Authority to mange the physical environment, require environmental impact assessments for any proposed developments, with the authority to halt projects that violate the requirements, and to promote environmental education. Ecotourism has also been prescribed as the alternative solution to tourism development for all the cases. Ecotourism allows for a more sustainable alternative to mass tourism, not only benefiting the environment, but the local population as well. Involving the local people from the planning stages throughout the entire development of the tourism project is crucial for the success of ecotourism. In this way, they will benefit from the revenues of tourism, becoming aware that it benefits them and their environment, not just the already wealthy and powerful transnational corporations and people.

V. FURTHER INFORMATION

A. Bibliography Mathieson, Alister and Geoffrey Wall. Tourism: Economic, Physical and Social Impacts. London: Longman, 1982. Mieczkowski, Zbigniew. Environmental Issues of Tourism and Recreation. Lanham: UP of America, 1995. B. WWW Sites Tourism in Bali

Cancun Tourism

Jamaica's Tourism Trade

Mediterranean Pollution and Tourism

Tobago Oil and Tourism

Small Islands Information Network

Tournet

PATA and the Environment

El Planeta Platica

Articles on Tourism and Environment

Tourism in Costa Rica

A Green Economy for Hawaii

Vietnam stakes tough laws on environment

Africa - Environment and Wildlife

C. Endnotes (1) Alister Mathieson and Geoffrey Wall, Tourism: Economic, Physical and Social Impacts, (London: Longman, 1982), 96. (2) Ibid., 98. (3) Ibid. (4) Zbigniew Mieczkowski, Environmental Issues of Tourism and Recreation, (Lanham: UP of America, 1995), 310. (5) Mathieson and Wall, 102. (6) Ibid., 104. (7) Ibid., 103. (8) Ibid., 104. (9) Ibid., 107. (10) Ibid., 109. (11) Ibid., 108. (12) Ibid., 109. (13) Ibid., 121. (14) Ibid. (15) Ibid. (16) Mieczkowski, 253. (17) Ibid., 254. (18) Ibid., 256. (19) Ibid., 257. (20) Ibid., 258-9. (21) Ibid., 261. (22) Ibid., 262. (23) Ibid., 271. (24) Ibid., 272. (25) ../../medit.htm (26) ../../jamtour.htm