TED Case Studies: Mammoths and Ivory Trade


TED Home Page About TED Research Projects Sort

Cases
TED

Cases Issue Papers Site Index

Case Number: 465

Case Mnemonice: MAMMOTH

Case Name: Mammoths and Trade

I. Identification

1. The Issue

There is considerable debate over the role of humans in the extinction of the mammoths from Eurasia and North America. Climate conditions played a large role, but some believe that new hunting tools developed by human beings were used to slaughter mammoths by the thousands. The mammoth provided resources in many ways: as meat, clothing, shelter, structural supports, and as crafts through the carving of mammoth ivory. Evidence exists that there was a ivory trading network in Neolithic times that was probably the first traded product in human history. These products were often carved figurines that are thought to relate to some religous rite. Mammoth ivory trade continues today as new specimens are found and provide an odd comparison with the modern trade in elephant ivory.

2. Description

The Tool Conjunction

The Tool Revolution, which occurred about 20,000 year ago, drastically changed human subsistence patterns. It was in this period that a true and efficient hunter-gatherer lifestyle emerged. Earlier anatomical moderns in Africa and their Neanderthal contemporaries in Europe did not seem to realize that bone, antler, ivory and related substances could be carved, polished, or otherwise shaped into formal artifacts that archaeologists call "point", "awls", "needles" and the like.(1) These tools were used for a variety of purposes, especially in making clothing and hunting.


Along with the Tool Conjunction came increased trade. It is widely known that trade had taken place between societies for nearly as long as there have been human beings. However, during this period trade drastically increased drastically. Anthropologists excavating archaeological sites in the Lascaux caves in France, which date back at least 20,000 years, have discovered large quantities of handcrafts made of sea shells. Since the site on the edge of the Massif Central part of France (near Limoges) is hundreds of miles from the ocean, the researchers concluded that this inland people traded with a people who lived on the coast, probably off the Bay of Biscay.(2) What did they barter in return? It is possible that the inland peoples traded furs from indigenous animals with the coastal peoples.


Most early trade in modern societies was, in fact, perhaps not for economic gain, but for cultural reasons. The sea shells from the Lascaux caves served no purpose that advanced the survival of the people. They were simply worn for adornment, usually indicating a place of status in the society. As noted, there was a large trade in mammoth ivory. The ivory was used to carve figurines (goddesses) most likely as part of some religious ritual. These figurines carved out of mammoth ivory are found at many sites all over Europe dating from the same period, many far from the actual areas where the mammoths lived. Trade in mammoth ivory probably involved the spread of the religious practice, in the same way that Arab spices spread Islam. Pastoralists are traders by necessity. They live in semi-arid areas that cannot support grain crops and most move their herds and flocks incessantly. Grains are especially needed, in exchange for animal hides. Pastoralists, however, can use this trading position to great purpose, as in the case of the Mongols and Arabs.(3) The trade probably also contributed to the demise of the wooly mammoth, an ironic distinction to today's demise of the elephant. There are other examples of ancient trade with a strong culture component, including amber.

"One of the most powerful stimuli of commercial relations between northern and southern Europe was the desire of the southern populations to secure amber, a material confined to the Baltic region and occurring particularly about the Jutland and the mouth of the Vistula. Amber beads have been found in Swiss pile- dwellings but also in Mycenean graves of the second millennium B.C."(4)

Given the physical difficulties of trade in ancient times, the role of amber or figurines were marginal in the people's subsistence and survival needs. Bulk items were traded infrequently. However, trade probably played a far more important role in transferring technology and culture. "Contact of peoples is thus an extraordinary promoter of cultural development."(5)


A Little History


The first human inhabitants of the North American continent came to the Arctic region about 50,000 B.C., although estimates of this date vary. Humans were able to make this trek due to an Ice Age, which lowered sea levels and created land bridges between the Eurasian and American continents, although crossings probably occurred in earlier and later years as well. This was about the time that a fundamental change in culture and technology occurred in human beings on the Eurasian continent. New tool technologies were brought to the New World by the migrating peoples.


About 11,000 years ago there were severe changes and fluctuations in large mammal populations in many parts of the world. In Eurasia, the wooly mammoth, wooly rhinoceros, and the giant or Irish elk, among other species, became extinct during these fluctuations. North American fauna was particularly devastated in this time and eight large mammal species became extinct. This coincided with the introduction of Paleoindians to the Americas from Asia.(6)


Another source places the climate chanmge event slightly earlier in time: "about 13,000 years ago, a global warming trend signaled the beginning of the terminal phase of the last ice age."(7) In this period, 32 genera of New World Animals became extinct by 7,000 BC, including horses, giant bison, oxen, elephants, camels, antelope, pig, ground sloths, an giant rodents.(8)


Many debate the degree of the human contribution to mega-fauna extinction in North America and elsewhere. Some believe that the extinctions are largely the result of non-human causes arguing that "climatic and environmental change was probably far more important to the extinctions."(9) New evidence, indicates, for example, that the most recent glacial retreat was climatically unique or that many prominent North American genera became extinct before people arrived. In Australia, the archaeological and fossil record suggests some striking parallels and differences with North America. The major difference to North America is that both the colonization of Australia and the extinctions may have occurred much earlier, perhaps as early as 45,000 years ago.(10)


The first human arrivals in North America were wooly mammoth hunters, whose annual hunts were the most important events in their lives.(11) Archaeological finds indicate their fixation on the mammoth in painting and in sculpture. Rituals consistently included reference to the mammoth because the people depended on it not only for food, but for clothing, ivory for use in rituals, and even tent shelters made from their hides and bones. Additionally, warmth inside the tent was provided by burning the animal's dung.


The mammoth hunters thrived. They were successful in hunting with efficient weaponry and developed a highly-effective social organization to kill the mammoths. The hunt not only met survival needs, but also served as a symbolic ritual and an initiation rite for young hunters. The hunters were so skillful that, by 20,000 B.C., the wooly mammoth became largely extinct in North America. Although the warming climatic conditions were partly responsible for the mammoth extinction, it is thought that human hunting hastened its demise by thousands of years.(12)


There is little evidence to support this progression of events, on indicator may be the tusk of the wooly mammoth. The tusk of the elephant show stages of life, much as rings of a tree describe the trees life. Paleontologist Daniel Fisher contends that mammoth and mastodon archaeological findings around the Great Lakes region of North America show the presence of intense human hunting pressure. Analysis of the tusk rings show that the animals ate properly and show no signs of a great climatic shift in their diets. The tusks also show normal gestation periods of four years for the mammoth, similar to elephants of today.(13)


3. Related Cases


The Virtual Conference on Culture, Trade, and Environment
The Culture Project
Elephant and Ivory Trade
Bronze Trade in Rome
Cedars of Lebanon and Deforestation in Antiquity
Rhincerous Horn Trade
Black Rhinoceros and Trade
Amber Trade in Ancient Periods
Sanctions on Environmental Trade
Modern Ivory Trade

4. Draft Author:

Jim Lee, October, 1997

II. Legal Clusters

5. Discourse and Status: Disagree and Complete

6. Forum and Scope: Many and Multilateral

7. Decision Breadth: Many

8. Legal Standing: Treaty

III. Geographic Clusters

9. Geographic Locations

a. Geographic Domain: Europe

b. Geographic Site: Northern Europe

c. Geographic Impact: Many

10. Sub-National Factors: No

11. Type of Habitat: Cool

During and just before the Neolithic the climate in the Northern Hemisphere was cooler than today. Rather than forests, the environments were comprised of vast grasslands.

IV. Trade Clusters

12. Type of Measure: Regulatory Standard

13. Direct v. Indirect Impacts: Indirect

14. Relation of Trade Measure to Environmental Impact

a. Directly Related to Product: Yes, Food

b. Indirectly Related to Product: Yes, Ivory

c. Not Related to Product: No

d. Related to Process: Yes, Species Loss Land

15. Trade Product Identification: Ivory

The recent slaughter of the world's elephant populations for ivory is reminiscent of the much earlier demise of the wooly mammoth. Ivory trade in modern times has decimated most of the world's elephant populations, especially those in Africa. Elephant protection has succeeded in some places, which has prompted calls for a resumption of elephant ivory trade. Import enforcement is a problem even in developed countries. While the Lacey Act and Endangered Species Act in the United States prohibited the importation of illegal ivory, it is very difficult to determine the difference between legal and illegal wildlife trade. During "1984, the United States imported approximately 7.5 tons of raw ivory, three-quarters of which reportedly came from Zaire, at a time when all commercial ivory exports from that country were banned."(14) Over 90 percent of ivory seized by U.S. customs officials was, in fact, mammoth ivory.

16. Economic Data


Inuit and Aleut Native Americans also used and traded mammoth ivory. Dorset culture has existed in North America since the birth of Christ and ivory carvings have been found as far back as 720 bc. By about 500 ad iron engraving tools for ivory were brought across the Bering Sea from Siberia to the Puknuk culture and spread to other peoples. The iron tools may have even come from China or Japan.


Many of these ivory carvings were not simply adornments but actually tools. In the far north of North America, of course there were no trees from which to make tools. Thus, ivory finds have included "harpoon heads, drills, picks, adzes, knives, scrapers, needle case, and ivory runners for hand drawn-sleds."(15)
The Thule culture originated in Alaska along the Beaufort Sea and focused on whale hunting. About 800 ad Thules and their culture spread eastward, eventually going all the way to Greenland. Thule culture dominanted Inuit culture until contact with European peoples and technology. In many ways, Thule culture was similar to the culture of the mammoth hunters. Instead of mammoth bone use in Tool Conjunction dwellings, Thule shelters were held up by whale rib and were also probably partly subterranean.


The North American ivory was used to trade with Europeans whalers who entered the areas, mostly small mementos. Thus, a carving industry developed around the Bering Sea. In the late 18th century ivory was traded in huge quantities in products ranging from handles for canes, mirrors, drawers, buttons, pastry wheels, sewing implements, musical instruments, billiard and cue balls.

17. Impact of Trade Restriction: Low

18. Industry Sector: Crafts

Ivory dating back at least to 3100 bc has been found in ancient pre- dynastic Egypt and Phoenician craftsmen developed a carving industry that flourished from the 16th century bc to the seventh century bc. Items included armlets, anklets, combs, games, and women figurines.(16)

19. Exporters and Importers: Many and Many

V. Environment Clusters

20. Environmental Problem Type: Species Loss Land

In this time, the major environmental impacts concentrated on a few specific species.
"At the very end of the Upper Paleolithic period, the grassland game herds of bison, horse, cattle, mammoth, and reindeer allowed a great efflorescence, then suddenly began to decline under the combined pressures of human overkill and rapid environmental fluctuations ending with the spread of Boreal forests at the Pleistocene-Recent transition from about 12,000 to 7500 B.C."(17)
Marvin Harris places this subsistence shift around the same time.
"By 10,000 B.P. much of the so-called Pleistocene megafauna had become extinct in Europe. Upper Paleolithic hunters "contributed to this ecological catastrophe, just as New World hunters probably played a role in the extinction of Pleistocene megafauna in the New World."(18)

Tool technology again evolved to meet the new environmental subsistence reality. "Thus Mesolithic people turned increasingly to a broad spectrum of plant foods and fish, mollusks, and other riverine and maritime sources of food." The pictures on cave walls could no longer show pictures of many large, wild animals.(19)

21. Name, Type, and Diversity of Species

Name: Wooly Mammoth and Mastadon

22. Resource Impact and Effect: Low and Scale

23. Urgency and Lifetime: Low and about 50 years

24. Substitutes: Like

VI. Other Factors

25. Culture: Yes

Around 40,000 years ago, evidence of greater technological refinement appeared in abundant cultural artifacts, still evident in carvings and paintings on rock. Personal adornments suddenly appeared in this period as evidence of the cultural take-off. This period marked the transition of our species to the modern Homo sapiens.
"Among the oldest types of art is personal decoration -- ornaments such as beads, bracelets, pendants and necklaces."(20) Richard Klein summarized this unique historical period as one which assimilated cultures over great distances.
"Perhaps most important, the artifact assemblages that antedate 40,000 years ago commonly exhibit far less variability through time and space than later ones, whose remarkable spatial and temporal heterogeneity has allowed archaeologists to recognize numerous distinctive artifact 'cultures,' even within relatively small regions of short time spans."(21)

Culture, trade, and environment came together at an earlier date. Statues of goddesses (Venus statues) were made from the ivory of wooly mammoth, although the animals were not killed primarily for their ivory. Venus statues dating back 30,000 years "may have possessed some ritual significance associated the fertility of women and animals with hormone imbalances that were given religious significance."(22)
Ivory was also a symbol of power and prestige.(23) The Bible notes that King Solomon "made a great throne of ivory and overlaid it with pure gold." (I Kings 10:18 and 2 Chronicles 9:17). The vilified and slain Ahab supposedly went even farther and built a house of ivory. (I Kings 22:39). A note of foreboding appeared in Amos 3:15: "and the houses of ivory shall perish."(24)

26. Trans-Boundary Issues: Yes

27. Rights: No

28. Relevant Literature

Endnotes


1. Judith E. Jacobsen and John Firor, eds., Human Impact on the Environment: Ancient Roots, Current Challenges, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992 and (also in above book) Richard Klein, "The Impact of Early People on the Environment: The Case of Large Mammal Extinctions," p. 21.
2. The recent find of the Iceman in a glacier on the Austrian-Italian border suggested he lived in a trading world. The pieces of wood and other items he carried were not found in that part of the Alps. Leon Jaroff, "Iceman," Time, October 26, 1992, pp. 62-66.
3. Harris, Culture, People, Nature, p. 199.
4. Robert Lowie, "The Determinants of Culture", p. 86, edited by Herbert Applebaum, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987.
5. Robert Lowie, "The Determinants of Culture", p. 89, edited by Herbert Applebaum, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987.
6. Judith E. Jacobsen and John Firor, eds., Human Impact on the Environment: Ancient Roots, Current Challenges, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992, in above, Richard Klein, "The Impact of Early People on the Environment: The Case of Large Mammal Extinctions," pp. 25-6.
7. Marvin Harris, Cannibals and Kings, New York, Vintage Books Edition: 1991 (first edition, Random House, 1977), 29-30.
8. Marvin Harris, Cannibals and Kings, New York, Vintage Books Edition: 1991 (first edition, Random House, 1977), 31., Harris, Culture, People, Nature, p. 164, New world mega-fauna extinctions exceeded those in the old world. In the new world 31 species became extinct. Harris, Culture, People, Nature, p. 167, In the new world, "because of the more extensive range of extinctions affecting the New World Pleistocene fauna, opportunities for animal domestication were limited by a lack of suitable wild species."
9. Judith E. Jacobsen and John Firor, eds., Human Impact on the Environment: Ancient Roots, Current Challenges, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992, in above, Richard Klein, "The Impact of Early People on the Environment: The Case of Large Mammal Extinctions," pp. 13-34. See also Grahm (1990), Grahm and Lundelius (1984), Gurthire (1984,199), and Lundelius (1988, 1989).
10. Judith E. Jacobsen and John Firor, eds., Human Impact on the Environment: Ancient Roots, Current Challenges, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992, in above, Richard Klein, "The Impact of Early People on the Environment: The Case of Large Mammal Extinctions," pp. 27.
11. These ancient cultures have been popularized in today's culture by books such as Jean Auel's, The Mammoth Hunters, New York: Bantam Books, 1986.
12. Russian scientists have recently found a type of wooly mammoth that lived on a remote Siberian island. Due to its location, it was apparently missed in pre-history by humans, because no evidence of humans has been discovered on the island. The first interesting fact is that because of the limited space, the mammoths evolved such that their numbers would not overwhelm the environment and therefore ensure their own survival. The Darwinian answer was to shrink in size and these mammoths were mere pygmies compared to their continental cousins. Second, it is thought that the mammoth became extinct throughout the northern hemisphere by about 10,000 B.C. Yet these pygmy mammoths, hidden from humans, survived probably until about 6,000 B.C. Other pygmy mammoths have been found on Catalina Island, off California with no evidence of human presence around this time.
13. Matt Creson, "Mammoth Tusks Tell Ancient Tales of Life and Murder", Denver Post, November 6, 1996, 32a.
14. Fitzgerald, Whose Business, p. 73.
15. Ivory: An International Survey, p. 294.
16. In Asia, ivory finds date back to the first dynasty, the Shang, which lasted from 1500-1027 bc. Findings from the Chou period were decorative (1027-56 bc). but by the Ming dynasty (1368- 1644) that they were used to make art. Burack, Ivory and its Uses,p. 17.
17. J. Lawrence Angel, "Paleoecology, Paleodemography and Health," p. 168.
18. Harris, Culture, People, Nature, p. 136.
19. Harris, Culture, People, Nature, p. 137.
20. Robert Hughes, "Behold this Stone Age," Time, 145/6, February 13, 1995, pp. 52-63. Quote from p. 54.
21. Judith E. Jacobsen and John Firor, eds., Human Impact, p. 21.
22. Harris, Culture, People, Nature, p. 130.
23. Sometime between 10,000 to 3,000 bc, the mammoths disappeared and the focus of ivory demand turned to elephants. At this time, they were found as far north as Libya and Mauritania in Africa and herds stretching all the way to Syria in Asia. Their extinction was mainly caused by ivory demand. Ivory: An International Survey, p. 35.
24. Burack, Ivory and its Uses, p. 16. Genghis Khan's grandson, Khan Kuyuk, also had a throne made of ivory (1206-48).

Go to All Cases

Go to TED Categories


October, 1997