![]()
The World Competitiveness Yearbook for 1997 from the IMD has ranked Finland as the fourth most competitive nation in the world. The United States, Singapore and Hong Kong achieved higher scores. The ranking evolution for Finland can be accessed on-line by following the link.
STRENGHTS
By employing Michael Porter's Diamond Framework for the Competitive Advantage of Nations we can analyze Finland's competitive advantages.
o Factor Endowments
o Demand Conditions
o Related and Supporting Industries
o Firm Strategy, Structure and Rivalry
Finland has set its objective to become the one of the leading information socities of the world. A society in which the information and media industries are important business sectors, everyone has access to services and the skill to use them, and structures and procedures of business life are augmented by the development of information technology.
WEAKNESSES
Finland's weaknesses can be quickly assessed. The domestic economy was ranked twenty-second. Finland must improve its economic condition in order to solidify claims to become a leading information technology society.
The technical know-how is produced abroad and imported in Finland. Finland imports a high percentage of its PCs and electronics equipment. Establishing cooperation between nations supplying knowledge to Finland is imperative. Although Finland has been highly successful in implementing new technologies within their own borders, they must begin to examine the contributions they can make to the EU community.
AUTHOR'S OPINION
Through my examination of the advanced strides Finland has made in the technology sector, I have come to believe that Finland is the country to watch in terms of developing technology and successfully applying it. Their efforts to research and develop technology, not only on the business or government levels, but by contributions of university students, is astounding. The willingness of the Finnish people to embrace the lastest technologies provides an outstanding environment to launch "cutting edge" technologies. The fact that they are well educated and exposed at a young age to these advances, contributes to their ease in adjusting.
My one concern is that Finland imports a large percentage of its equipment. The dependence upon outside sources for such advanced equipment must be either be minimized or viable alternatives proposed.
Forward
to Analysis: Impacts on (non-IT) Firms
Back
to Legal Environment in Finland
Last Update: 5 May 1997